Spatial Analysis of Urban Squares
AbstractUrban squares, despite their apparently self-evident consistency, actually represent one of the most uncertain issues of present urban planning. Denied and neglected by modern architecture, then sought after in the last decades, squares are commonly recognized as fundamental identity making elements in urban settlements as well as in their respective communities. Since their revival in the late ‘900, the design of urban squares has been a challenging task for generations of planners and urban designers, since, despite any effort, most of the squares worked out can hardly succeed in competing with the historic ones. What appears to explain the failure of most attempts is the actual uncertainty in the definition of what an urban square really is, or should be: not a mere open space, nor only a pedestrian path, nor necessarily a wide or regular space, nor always a junction of streets. Perhaps all these things together, but also something more, what makes the matter to overcome the limits of a strictly physical vision to approach social and cultural meanings. The purpose of this research is therefore to investigate around the link between spatial aspects and social issues, so as to identify the spatial features that allow an urban square to actually play a social and cultural role. As a testing ground of such effort a wide set of Italian squares was assumed as a case studies series, in order to catch the spatial code of their success as relation and public representation places; and some configurational parameters will then be proposed for reproducing such capability, so as to actually support the planning and design of urban squares.
Cutini, V. (2001), “Centrality and Land Use: Three Case Studies on the Configurational Hypothesis”, in Cybergeo, Revue Europeenne de Geographie, n. 188, 26 mars 2001.
Cutini, V. (2007), “Grilling the Grid: a Non-Ultimate (Nor Objective) Report on the Configurational Approach to Urban Phenomena”, in The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems pp. 163-183. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Freeman, L.C. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness, Sociometry, vol. 40, pp. 35-41.
Hillier B. (1996a), Space is the Machine: a Configurational Theory of Architecture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hillier, B. (1996b), “Cities as Movement Economies”, in Urban Design International, vol. 1 (1), pp. 41-60.
Hillier B (2005), “The art of place and the science of space”, World Architecture 11/2005 185, Beijing, Special Issue on Space Syntax, pp 96-102.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984), The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK).
Hillier, B., Iida, S. (2005), “Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement”, in Cohn, A. G., & Mark, D. M. (Eds.) Spatial Information Theory: COSIT 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3693, 475-490. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Hillier, B; Vaughan, L. (2007), “The city as one thing”, Progress in Planning , 67 (3) 205 - 230.
Portoghesi P. (1990) La piazza come “luogo degli sguardi”, Gangemi, Roma.
Sitte C. (1889), City Planning According to Artistic Principles, Translated by George R. Collins and Christiane Crasemann Collins, Phaidon Press, London, 1965.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., Penn, A. (2001), “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: a Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space”, in Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 28, pp. 103-121.
Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)