Immagine di copertina

Achieving People Friendly Accessibility. Key Concepts and a Case Study Overview

Michela Tiboni, Silvia Rossetti

Abstract


The present paper stems from the evidence that one of the reasons of the “crisis” of today's cities probably depend on mobility issues.   But what should be done to confront all the negative impacts of passenger transportation, without curbing mobility? Can Urban Engineering be applied to promote a friendlier mobility, that should be not only environment and climate friendly, but user friendly as well? And how? A "people friendly" accessibility approach is presented and conceived as a solution to better integrate land uses with the transport system, satisfying people's expectations (especially those of vulnerable users) to easily reach the opportunities they wish to engage with.  The case study of Amsterdam, as walkable and cycle friendly city, is briefly presented and reveal good practices in the field of urban and mobility planning.  Finally, an isochronical accessibility analysis of Amsterdam is applied: it represent catchment areas of railways stations and of supermarkets, and it highlights how much the structure of the city supports bicycle use.

Keyword


Urban planning; Friendly mobility, Accessibility; Amsterdam

Full Text

PDF (English)

Riferimenti bibliografici


Banister, D. (2008), “The sustainable mobility paradigm”, Transport Policy, Elsevier, 15: 73-80.

Benevolo, L. (2012), Il tracollo dell’urbanistica italiana, Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Bertolini, L. (2012), “Integrating Mobility and Urban Development Agendas: a Manifesto”, The Planning Review, Routledge, 48(1): 16-26.

Busi, R. (2013), “L’accessibilità come valore etico e sociale”, in Pezzagno M. (ed.), Living and Walking in Cities. Cultures and Techniques for Accessibility, Egaf, Forlì.

Busi, R. (2010), “For a Safer City. A Friendlier City. And a More Beautiful City”, TeMA, 3(SP): 39-46.

Busi, R. (2011), “Methods, Techniques and Policies for Mobility in the Friendly City”, TeMA, 4(2):7-18.

Busi, R. (2012), “Multiplicity and complexity in interpreting the meaning of ‘friendly city’”, in Pezzagno M., Docchio S. (eds.), Living and walking in cities. Sustainable mobility and road safety, XVIII International Conference, Egaf, Forlì.

Campos Venuti, G. (1999), “Il trasporto su ferro per trasformare le città: Roma a confronto con le metropoli europee”, Urbanistica, 112: 37-46.

Campos Venuti G. (2010), Città senza cultura. Intervista sull’Urbanistica, Editori Laterza, Bari.

Dutch Ministry of Transport and Public Works (1990), Second Transport Structure Plan, Ministry of Transport and Public Works, The Hague.

European Commission (2011), White Paper. Roadmap to a Single European transport Area. Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, EU Publications office, Brussels.

European Commission (2012), EU transport in Figures. Statistical pocketbook 2012, Publication office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Foletta, N., Field, S. (2011), Europe’s Vibrant New Low Car(bon) Communities, ITDP, New York.

Handy, S. (2002), Accessibility vs Mobility. Enhancing Strategies for Addressing Automobile Dependence in the U.S, Institute for Transportation Studies, UC Davies.

Hull, A., Silva, C., Bertolini, L. (2012), Accessibility Instruments for Planning Practice in Europe, Clássica Artes Gráficas SA, Portugal.

Le Clerq, F., Bertolini, L. (2003), Achieving Sustainable Accessibility: an Evaluation of Policy Measures in the Amsterdam Area, Built Environment, 29(1): 36-47.

Marshall, S. (2001), “The challenge of sustainable transport”, in Layard A., Davoudi S., Batty S. (eds.), Planning for a sustainable future, Spon, London, 131-147.

Martens, M.J., Van Griethuysen, S. (1999), The ABC Location Policy in The Netherlands. The Right Business at the Right Place, TNO-INRO, Delft.

Salzano, E. (2003), Fondamenti di urbanistica. La storia e la norma, Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Santos, G., Behrendt, H., Teytelboym, A. (2010), “Part I: Policy Instruments for Sustainable Road Transport”, Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1): 46-91.

Scheurer, J. (2001), Urban Ecology. Innovations in housing policy and the future of cities. Towards sustainability in neighbourhood communities, Murdoch University, Perth.

Tiboni, M., Rossetti, S. (2012), “L'utente debole quale misura dell'attrattività urbana”, TeMA, 5(3): 91-102.

Tiboni, M., Rossetti, S. (2011), “The Role of Urban Planning into a long-term Climate Friendly Transport Vision”, in Radmilovič Z., Čišic D. (eds.), Shaping Climate Friendly Transport in Europe: Key Findings & Future Directions, University of Belgrade Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Belgrade.

Tira, M. (1999), “Comfort, sicurezza e accessibilità”, Paesaggio Urbano, mag-giu, 58-63.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2001), Mobility 2001. World mobility at the end of the twentieth century and its sustainability, Atar Roto Presse, Geneva.

World Health Organization Regional office for Europe (WHO Europe) (2004), Racioppi F., Eriksson L., Tingvall C., Villaveces A. (edited by), Preventing Road traffic Injury: a Public Health Perspective for Europe, WHO, Copenhagen.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2487

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunina-12861

Metriche dell'articolo

Caricamento metriche ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I cookie utilizzati servono al corretto funzionamento del sito. Proseguendo la navigazione senza modificare le impostazioni del browser, accetti di ricevere tutti i cookie.
Per maggiori informazioni.
ok


Direttore responsabile: Rocco Papa | print ISSN 1970-9889 | on line ISSN 1970-9870 | © 2008 | Registrazione: Cancelleria del Tribunale di Napoli, n° 6, 29/01/2008 | Rivista realizzata con Open Journal System e pubblicata dal Centro di Ateneo per le Biblioteche dell'Università di Napoli Federico II.