City/Sea Searching for a New Connection. Regeneration Proposal for Naples Waterfront Like an Harbourscape: Comparing Three Case Studies
AbstractThe port is a strategic area of transition, where it is possible to perceive the territory-landscape and the urban front. However it lost its urban character, gradually becoming an high specialized independent machines, a sectorial infrastructure divided from the city: this phenomenon has created increasingly socio-economical marginalization. Within a double view, lengthwise and transverse, we can describe the port as a space closed to the city and as an unfathomable barrier for the transverse flows that previously connected the waterfront to the city. The paper examines the case study of Naples, where the port expansion continues to grow without any integration with other parts of the city, distorting its “urban area” role, establishing its independence and making urban system compatibility conditions even weaker. The functional and physical division increases the perception of the port as a barrier rather than a filter. Turning the sense of these conditions aims at rethinking waterfront as a public space, a place where integration and specialization spaces become new open and accessible spatial devices. In some contemporary European and American cities (Aalborg, Oslo and Toronto) we could see the port as multifunctional system, an interdisciplinary project that creates urban spaces integrated to the city and that allows the coexistence of different uses. The project of a new public space between the sea and the hinterland could involve all these conflicting functions creating, with different strategies, a potential multifunctional landscape. In Naples as well, where the waterfront is still waiting to be re-connected with the story of the city itself.
Ahern, J.F. (2002), Greenways as Strategic Landscape Planning: Theory and Application, Wageningen University, Netherlands.
Belanger, P. (2009), “Landscape as Infrastructure”, Landscape Journal, 28, 79-95.
Berger, A. (2006), Drosscape. Wasting Land in Urban America, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
Borsa, D., D’Amia, G. (2011), “Il fiordo di Oslo. Un laboratorio europeo di trasformazione urbana”, Territorio, 56, 138-140.
City of Toronto (2010),Toronto Official Plan.
Formato, E. (2012), “Napoli Est: un campo di norme senza progetto”. In: Russo M., Lucci R. (eds.), Napoli verso oriente. Clean, Napoli.
Gren, M., Svensson, L., Carlsson, M., Bishop, K. (2010), “Policy design for a multifunctional landscape”, Regional Environmental Change, 10(4), 339-348.
Gronning, O. (2011), ”What is the Fjord City”, Territorio, 56, 141-150.
Kiib, H. (2007), Harbourscape, Aalborg University Press, Aalborg.
Kato, S., Ahern, J. (2009), “Multifunctional Landscapes as a Basis for Sustainable Landscape Development”, Landscape Research Japan, 72(5), 799-804.
Mossop, E. (2006), “Landscapes of infrastructures”, in Waldheim C. (ed.), Landscape Urbanism Reader, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 165-177.
Municipality of Oslo (2008), The Fjord City – Plans for Urban Development of the Waterfront.
Russo, M. (2010), “Napoli e la sua costa. Contraddizioni di un territorio duale”, in Savino M. (ed.), Waterfront d’Italia. Piani politiche progetti, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Russo, M. (2014), “Waterfront portuale. Paesaggi e potenzialità di uno spazio conteso”, TRIA, Territorio della Ricerca su Insediamenti e Ambiente. Rivista internazionale di cultura urbanistica, 12, in press.
Skogstand Aamo, A. (2004), “Oslo: turning a port city into a fjord city”, Topos: europeanlandscape magazine, 48, 50-58.
Tvilde, D. (2011), “Oslo’s waterfront and urban territory: dynamics of transformation”, Territorio, 56, 151-157.
Sordi, J. (2011), “Toronto. Infrastrutture e paesaggio per una nuova ecologia urbana”, Eco Web Town, 2.
Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)