Social Housing in Urban Regeneration. Regeneration Heritage Existing Building: Methods and Strategies
AbstractThe theme of urban regeneration has played a strategic role during the last two decades in European and national urban building policies. Current addresses, also defined in Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities in 2007, indentify the necessity to invest in requalification of degraded residential assets and not in new developments, individuating in urban regeneration the main tool for development of contemporary city. Public neighborhoods have developed, historically, a wide set of common problems. They are not only due to wrong planning but also to the concept of “housing for masses”. The original ambition of modern settlment, developed from GermanSiedlung, was to be an autonomous part, on the point of view of morphology, in urban expansion. Joined by new developments, a lot of neighborhoods became benchmarks for suburban areas and now we can define themas “new urban centralities”. So theirrole in urbandynamics has changed and they can be individuate dasprecious reserves of public spaces and potential incubators for regeneration of larger areas. Analyzing some Italian and European case studies, themostinnovative relate to the densification of open spaces, inserting new services in a general redesign of green areas; concentration of built surfaces, in order to reduce land consumption and introduction of different residential types in order to improve mischbebauung. The reasons for an active recovery are motivated by the criteria of environmental sustainability and saving land, have relaunched compact projects with medium to highdensity.
Berger, A. (2006), Drosscape, Wasting land in urban America, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
Bianchini, F., Bloomfield, J. (2004), Planning for the intercultural city, Comedia, Stroud.
Bonomi, A., Abruzzese, A. (2004), La città infinita, Mondadori, Milano.
Evans, G. (2005),”Measure for measure, Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration”, in Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 959-983.
Franke, S., Cerhagen, E. (2005),Creativity and the City, Rotterdam, NAiPublishers.
Fusco Girard, L., Nijkamp, P. (eds.) (2004), Energia, bellezza, partecipazione: La sfida della sostenibilità. Valutazioni integrate tra conservazione e sviluppo, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Galdini, R. (2008), Reinventare la città. Strategie di rigenerazione urbana in Italia e in Germania, Franco Angeli Edizioni.
Montgomery, J. (2003), ‘Cultural Quarters as Mechanisms for Urban Regeneration, Part 1: Conceptualising Cultural Quarters’, in Planning Practice and Research, 18(4), 293–306.
Oswalt, P. (2006), Shrinking Cities, International Research, Vol. 1, Hatje Cantz Verlag, Ostfildern-Ruit, Germania.
Smith, N. (2002), “New globalism, new urbanism, Gentrification as global urban strategy”, Antipode, 34(3), 427–450.
Todaro, B., De Matteis, F. (2013), Il Secondo Progetto, Prospettive Edizioni, Roma.
Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)