Ecosystem Services and Border Regions. Case Study from Czech – Polish Borderland
Land-use management and planning of cross-border regions is a complex problem. Different legislatures, development visions and interests on both sides of the border make it even more complicated. Introducing ecosystem services concept into land-use planning and management at cross-border regions is a challenge. However not much is said about this issue in literature.
This paper aims to present result of the study concerning to ecosystem services concept in the context of cross-border part of Pradziad Euroregion. The studyed area is situated within Czech – Polish borderland. First part of the research concerns to land-cover analyze of the region. The second one to Czech and Polish land-use strategies, which are binding at NUTS 4 and 5 level in the studyed area.
Resoults of the research indicates asymmetry of the cross-border landscape of the analyzed region. The asymmetry is indicated by different types, biodiversities and areas of ecosystems identified on both sides of the border. It is also identified by differences in land-use strategies concerning to the region.It is discussed to what extend ecosystem services concept can be implemented in planning legislature of the cross-border region.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F. (2012), “Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets”, Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29.
Ekotoxa s.r.o. (2010), Rozbor udržitelného rozvoje území pro správní obvod ORP Jeseník 2010 – aktualizace, Brno.
Ernstson, H. (2013), “The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 7-17.
Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P. (2009), “Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making”, Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653.
Haluza J. (2008), Územně analytické podklady pro správní obvod městského úřadu Krnov, Ostrava.
Jax, K., Barton, D.N., Chan, K.M.A., Groot, R. De, Doyle, U., Eser, U., Wichmann, S. (2013), “Ecosystem services and ethics”, Ecological Economics, 93, 260-268.
Klepacz, A. (2000), Strategia Rozwoju Powiatu Prudnickiego, Prudnik.
Laurans, Y., Rankovic, A., Billé, R., Pirard, R., Mermet, L. (2013), “Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making : Questioning a literature blindspot”, Journal of Environmental Management, 119, 208- 219.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a framework for assessment, Island Press.
Ministerstwo Budownictwa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Departament Ładu Przestrzennego i Architektury, Ministerstvo pro Místní Rozvoj České Republiky, Odbor Územních Vazeb (2006), Studium zagospodarowania przestrzennego pogranicza polsko – czeskiego, Wrocław, Praga.
Opolska Fundacja Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (2013), Strategia rozwoju współpracy polsko-czeskiej w Euroregionie Pradziad na lata 2014-2020, Opole.
Paasi, A. (2010), “Regions are social constructs, but who or what “constructs” them? Agency in question”, Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2296-2301.
Palmer, M.A. (2012), “Socioenvironmental Sustainability and Actionable Science”, BioScience, 62(1), 5-6.
Rada Powiatu w Nysie (2004), Strategia Rozwoju Wspólnoty Międzygminno – Powiatowej Ziemi Nyskiej na lata 2004 – 2015, Nysa.
Spyra, M. (2014), “The feasibility of implementing cross-border land-use management strategies: A report from three Upper Silesian Euroregions”, iForest. Article in-press.
Syrbe, R.-U., Walz, U. (2012), “Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics”, Ecological Indicators, 21, 80-88.
Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., Santolini, R. (2012), “Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes”, Ecological Indicators, 21, 134-144.
Steiner, F. (2014), “Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research”, Landscape and Urban Planning. Article in-press.
Tuan, Q., Kuenzer, C., Minh, Q., Moder, F., Oppelt, N. (2012), “Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services”, Ecological Indicators, 23, 431-446.
Xiang, W.-N. (2014), “Doing real and permanent good in landscape and urban planning: Ecological wisdom for urban sustainability”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 65-69.
Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)