Immagine di copertina

Bio-Energy Connectivity And Ecosystem Services. An Assessment by Pandora 3.0 Model for Land Use Decision Making

Raffaele Pelorosso, Federica Gobattoni, Francesco Geri, Roberto Monaco, Antonio Leone


Landscape connectivity is one of the major issues related to biodiversity conservation and to the delivery of Ecosystem Services (ES). Several models were developed to assess landscape connectivity but lack of data and mismatching scale of analysis often represent insurmountable constraints for the correct evaluation and integration of ecological connectivity into plans and assessment procedures. In this paper a procedure for ES assessment related with Habitat and Bio-Energy Landscape Connectivity (BELC) is proposed. The method is based on the connectivity measure furnished by the last version of PANDORA model and uses a modified formulation of current ES evaluation. The implementation of the model in a real case has highlighted its potential multi-scale workability. The spatial approach of the model aims at furnishing a further tool for the spread of ES and landscape ecology concepts into procedures of assessment (e.g. EIA, SEA) and land use planning at different administrative scales.


Landscape connectivity; Urban planning; Environmental Assessment; Environmental modeling

Full Text

PDF (English)

Riferimenti bibliografici

Ahern, J. (2012), “Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design”, Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203-1212.

Bastian, O. (2013), “The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites”, Ecological Indicators, 24, 12-22.

Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M. (1997), “The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital”, Nature, 387(6630), 253-260.

ECTP-CEU, European Council of Spatial Planners (2013), The Charter of European Planning, approved by the General assembly of Barcelona the 22th April 2013.

Foley, J. a, Defries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. a, Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. a, Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., Snyder, P.K. (2005), “Global consequences of land use”, Science, 309, 570-574.

Foltête, J.-C., Clauzel, C., Vuidel, G. (2012), “A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks”, Environmental Modelling and Software, 38, 316-327.

Forman, R.T.T. (1995), “Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology”, Landscape Ecology, 10(3), 133-142.

Girardet, X., Foltête, J.-C., Clauzel, C. (2013), “Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 42, 10-17.

Gobattoni, F., Groppi, M., Monaco, R., Pelorosso, R. (2014), “New developments and results for mathematical models in environment evaluations”, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, accepted.

Gobattoni, F., Lauro, G., Monaco, R., Pelorosso, R. (2012), “Mathematical Models in Landscape Ecology: Stability Analysis and Numerical Tests”, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 125(1), 173-192.

Gobattoni, F., Pelorosso, R., Lauro, G., Leone, A., Monaco, R. (2011), “A procedure for mathematical analysis of landscape evolution and equilibrium scenarios assessment”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(3-4), 289-302.

Gulickx, M.M.C., Verburg, P.H., Stoorvogel, J.J., Kok, K., Veldkamp, A. (2013), “Mapping landscape services: a case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands”, Ecological Indicators, 24, 273-283.

Hermann, A., Schleifer, S., Wrbka, T. (2011), “The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review”, Living Rev. Landscape Res., 5(1), 1-37.

Karjalainen, T.P., Marttunen, M., Sarkki, S., Rytkönen, A.-M. (2013), 2Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: An analytic–deliberative approach”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 40, 54-64.

Luque, S., Saura, S., Fortin, M.-J. (2012), “Landscape connectivity analysis for conservation: insights from combining new methods with ecological and genetic data”, Landscape Ecology, 27(2), 153-157.

Mancebo Quintana, S., Martín Ramos, B., Casermeiro Martínez, M. a, Otero Pastor, I. (2010), “A model for assessing habitat fragmentation caused by new infrastructures in extensive territories - evaluation of the impact of the Spanish strategic infrastructure and transport plan”, Journal of environmental management, 91(5), 1087–96.

Marulli, J., Mallarach, J.M. (2005), “A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: application to the Barcelona Metropolitan Area”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2-4), 243-262.

MEA (2003), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment, Island Press.

Ng, C.N., Xie, Y.J., Yu, X.J. (2013), “Integrating landscape connectivity into the evaluation of ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation and its implications for landscape planning”, Applied Geography, 42, 1-12.

Pelorosso, R., Gobattoni, F., Lauro, G., Monaco, R., Leone, A. (2012), “Pandora: modello per l’analisi di scenario a supporto delle pianificazioni”, Urbanistica, 149, 129-138.

Pelorosso, R., Leone, A., Boccia, L. (2009), “Land cover and land use change in the Italian central Apennines: A comparison of assessment methods”, Applied Geography, 29(1), 35-48.

Saura, S., Pascual-Hortal, L. (2007), “A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2-3), 91-103.

Scolozzi, R., Geneletti, D. (2012a), “A multi-scale qualitative approach to assess the impact of urbanization on natural habitats and their connectivity”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 36, 9-22.

Scolozzi, R., Geneletti, D. (2012b), “Assessing habitat connectivity for land-use planning: a method integrating landscape graphs and Delphi survey”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(6), 813-830.

Tannier, C., Foltête, J.-C., Girardet, X. (2012), “Assessing the capacity of different urban forms to preserve the connectivity of ecological habitats”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1-2), 128-139.

Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P. (2009), “Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development”, Landscape Ecology, 24(8), 1037-1052.

Tianhong, L., Wenkai, L., Zhenghan, Q. (2010), “Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen”, Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1427-1435.

Xie, G.D., Lu, C.X., Leng, Y.F., Zhang, D., Li, S.D. (2003), “Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau”, Journal of Natural Resources, 18(2), 189-196 (in Chinese).

Zurlini, G., Petrosillo, I., Aretano, R., Castorini, I., D’Arpa, S., De Marco, A., Pasimeni, M.R., Semeraro, T., Zaccarelli, N. (2014), “Key fundamental aspects for mapping and assessing ecosystem services: predictability of ecosystem service providers at scales from local to global”, Annali di Botanica, 4, 61-71.



Metriche dell'articolo

Caricamento metriche ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I cookie utilizzati servono al corretto funzionamento del sito. Proseguendo la navigazione senza modificare le impostazioni del browser, accetti di ricevere tutti i cookie.
Per maggiori informazioni.

Direttore responsabile: Rocco Papa | print ISSN 1970-9889 | on line ISSN 1970-9870 | © 2008 | Registrazione: Cancelleria del Tribunale di Napoli, n° 6, 29/01/2008 | Rivista realizzata con Open Journal System e pubblicata dal Centro di Ateneo per le Biblioteche dell'Università di Napoli Federico II.