Residential Location Preferences. The Significance of Socio-Cultural and Religious Attributes

  • Gobi Krishna Sinniah University Teknology Malaysia
  • Muhammad Zaly Shah University Teknology Malaysia
  • Geoff Vigar School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University
  • Paulus Teguh Aditjandrad New-Rail-Centre for Railway Research, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University
Keywords: Residential Location Preferences, Travel Behaviors, Cultural and Religious Factors

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explore residential location preferences and how they are related to travel behavior. The literature focuses on the preferences in relation to physical and demographic aspects, such as land uses, facilities, transportation facilities, transportation services, car ownership, income, household size and travel accessibility. However, this study suggests social and cultural issue such as racial diversity which is literally to be a significance context. The case study reported here is based on Iskandar Malaysia’s development region. Reliability Analysis and Factor Analysis are applied to determine that religious and culture are influential in terms of residential location preferences. These findings add a different perspective on travel behavior studies, which are heavily dominated by researches from Western Europe, North America and Australasia. It is suggested that transport researchers need to reject universal conclusions and be clearer about the contexts in which their findings most applied and in multi-cultural scenarios to consider cultural and religious factors more extensively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gobi Krishna Sinniah, University Teknology Malaysia

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment. Ph.D. candidate in Transportation Planning 

Muhammad Zaly Shah, University Teknology Malaysia

Senior Lecturer in the Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Head, Logistics and Transportation Laboratory, Faculty of Built Environment 

Geoff Vigar, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University

Professor of Urban Planning at Newcastle University

Paulus Teguh Aditjandrad, New-Rail-Centre for Railway Research, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University

Research Associate with NewRail-Centre for Railway Research, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University

References

Abrahamse, W., Steg, I., Gifford, R, Vlek, C. (2009), 'Factor Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality' Transport Research Part F 12, 317-324.

Aditjandra, P.T. (2008), 'The Relationship Between Urban Form And Travel Behavior: A Micro-Analysis In Tyne And Wear'. PhD Thesis, School of engineering and Geoscience, Newcastle University, UK

Aditjandra, P.T., Cao, EJ and Mulley, C. (2012), 'Understanding Neighborhood Design Impact On Travel Behavior: An Application of Structural Equation Model to A British Metropolitan Data'. Transportation Research Part A. 46, 22-32.

Anable, J. (2005), ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalist’? Identifying travel behavior segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy 12 (2005), 65-78

Boarnet, M. G. and Crane, R. (2001), 'The Influences of Land Use On Travel Behavior: Empirical Strategies' Transportation Research Part A, 35, 823-845.

Bohte, W., Maat, K. and Wee, B.V. (2009), 'Measuring Attitudes In Research on Residential Self-Selection and Travel Behavior: A Review On Theories and Empirical Research' Transport Reviews, 29 (3), 325–357.

Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. and Handy, S. (2007), 'Do Changes In Neighborhood Characteristics Lead To Changes In Travel Behavior? A Structural Equations Modeling Approach' Transportation, 34 (5), 535-556.

Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. and Handy, S. (2009), 'The relationship between the built environment and non-work travel: A case study of Northern California' Transportation Research A, 43, 548-559.

Cervero, R. (2002), 'Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework' Transportation Research D, 7, 265–284.

Curtis, C. and Perkins, T. (2006), 'Travel Behavior: A Review of Recent Literature' Working Paper No.3, Urban Net.

Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M and Burghouwt, G. (2002), 'Urban Form and Travel Behavior: Micro-Level Household Attributes and Residential Context' Urban Studies, 39 (3), 507-527.

Handy, S. (1996), 'Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior' Transportation Research D 1, 151-165.

Handy, S., Cao, X. and Mokhtarian, P. (2005), 'Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California' Transportation Research D, 10, 427–444.

Ho, C.S, Simson, J., Matsuoka, Y, and Gomi, K. (2012), 'Low Carbon Urban Development Strategy In Malaysia - The Case Of Iskandar Malaysia Development Corridor' Habitat International, 1–9.

IRDA. (2010), 'Iskandar Malaysia Blueprint Report'.

Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L. and Laidet, L. (1997), 'A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in San Francisco Bay Area' Transportation, 24, 125–158.

Mahmassani, H.S. (2002), ' in Perpetual Motion. Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges' Book Review. 8th Meeting of the International Association for Travel Behavior Research, Austin, Texas, US. Marshall, S. (2005), 'Streets and Patterns' London and New York, Spon Press.

Mokhtarian, P. L. and Cao,.X. (2008), 'Examining The Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: A Focus On Methodologies' Transportation Research Part B, 42, 204-228.

Naess, P. (2005), 'Residential location affects travel behavior—But how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area' Progress in Planning, 63, 167–257.

Naess, P. (2009), 'Residential Self-Selection and Appropriate Control Variables in Land Use: Travel Studies' Transport Reviews, 29, 293-324.

Scheiner, J. (2010), ' Social Inequalities In Travel Behavior: Trip Distances In The Context Of Residential Self-Selection And Lifestyles ' Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 679 – 690.

Scheiner, J. and Kasper, B. (2003), ' Lifestyles, Choices of Housing Location and Daily Mobility: The Lifestyle Approach In The Context of Spatial Mobility and Planning ' International Social Science Journal, 55 (176), 319 – 332.

Schwanen, T. and Mokhtarian, P.L (2005a), ' What Effects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure Or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography 13 (1), 83 – 99.

Sinniah, G.K., Zaly Shah, M., Ho, C. S. (2013), ' The needs for changes in travel behavior towards a low carbon society' American International Journal of Contemporary Research, Vol.3 No.3, March.

Susilo, Y. O and Dijst, M. (2009), 'How Far Is Too Far? Travel Time Ratios For Activity Participations In The Netherlands' Transportation Research Record, 2134, 89 – 98.

Susilo, Y.O., Williams, K., Lindsay, M. and Dair, C. (2012), ' The Influence Of Individuals’ Environmental Attitudes And Urban Design Features On Their Travel Patterns In Sustainable Neighborhoods In The UK ' Transportation Research Part D, 17, 190–200.

Van Acker, V., Witlox, F., Wee, Bv. (2007), 'The Effects of The Land Use System on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach ' Transportation Planning and Technology, 30 (4), 331–353.

Published
2014-07-18
How to Cite
Sinniah, G., Shah, M., Vigar, G., & Aditjandrad, P. (2014). Residential Location Preferences. The Significance of Socio-Cultural and Religious Attributes. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 7(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2656