A Land-use Approach for Capturing Future Trip Generating Poles
Changes in the usage of a particular urban or regional area have immediate effects on transportation, such as the development of a new multimodal terminal within a city, or the creation of a business park in its outskirts. Thus far, this correlation has been under-researched at a national level in Greece. As a result, its effects on trip generation and passenger flows has been underestimated at the planning level, leading to the implementation of projects that are neither viable nor sustainable. This paper proposes that land use changes ought to be considered in tandem with transport-related changes at the planning stage. To this effect, we present a three-step methodology for an integrated approach to capturing future trip generation: the identification of future trip-generating poles within the study area; the development of scenarios related to the probability of these changes occurring and their potential magnitude; an estimation of future trends in passenger flows. The methodology is applied to the Metropolitan area of Thessaloniki, Greece. Using data obtained from development plans, national statistical services and research projects’ and studies’ findings, we estimate future trip-generation subsequent to land use change. Data is processed and evaluated by a local experts’ group, representing various key-disciplines of the area’s planning stakeholders.
Badoe, D. A., & Miller, E. J. (2000). Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5(4), 235-263. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00036-X.
Boarnet, M., & Crane, R. (2001). The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(9), 823-845. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00019-7.
Cervero, R. (1996). Mixed land-uses and commuting evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 30(5), 361-377. doi:10.1016/0965-8564(95)00033-X.
Cervero, R., & Radisch, C. (1996). Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy, 3(3), 127-141. doi:10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9.
Cervero, R. (1998). Land-use mixing and suburban mobility. Transportation Quarterly, 42(1988), 429–446.
City of Thessaloniki (2009). Master Plan for Thessaloniki’s Metropolitan Area.
EEA - European Environmental Agency (2010). The European Environment — State and Outlook 2010. Urban Environment. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/europe/urban-environment. Last accessed: March, 2015
ELSTAT- Hellenic Statistical Authority (2014). Census data. Last accessed: March, 2015. www.statistics.gr.
Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004 b). Land-use/transport interaction models as tools for sustainability impact assessment of transport investments: review and research perspectives. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 4(3), 333-355.
Geurs, K. T., & Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127-140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
Gordon, R. (1994). New Data and Old Models in Urban Economics. Cambridge, UK: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Giuliano, G., and S. Hanson (2004). The Geography of Urban Transportation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781609180997
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8. Available at: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n10.pdf.
Hunt, J., Kriger, D. & Miller, E. (2005) Current operational urban land‐use–transport modelling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 329-376. doi:10.1080/0144164052000336470.
ITE - Institution of Traffic Engineers (1976). Traffic Engineering Handbook, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: ITE.
Koppelman, F.S. and E.I. PAS (1984) Estimation of disaggregate regression models of person trip generation with multiday data. In J. Volmuller & R. Hamerslag (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 513-531). Utrecht, NL: VNU Science Press. ISBN: 9789067640084.
Levinson, H.S. (1976). Urban travel characteristics. In: J.E. Baerwald (Ed.), Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook (pp. 138–206). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Litman, T. (2003). Measuring Transportation: Traffic Mobility and Accessibility. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available at: www.vtip.org/tca.
Mackett, R. (1993). Structure of linkages between transport and land use. Transport Research Part B: Methodological, 27B(3),189-206. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(93)90029-A.
Mitsakis, E., Stamos, I., Grau, J. M. S., Chrysochoou, E., Iordanopoulos, P., & Aifadopoulou, G. (2013). Urban Mobility Indicators for Thessaloniki. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, 1(2), 148-152. doi: 10.12720/jtle.1.2.148-152.
Morfoulaki, M., Mitsakis, E., Chrysostomou, K., & Stamos, I. (2011). The contribution of urban mobility management to trip planning and the environmental upgrade of urban areas. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 162-170. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.021
Morris, J., Dumble, P., & Wigan M. (1979) Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 13(2), 91-109. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8.
Ortuzar, J., & Willumsen, G. (2001). Modeling Transport (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 0-471-86110-3.
Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S., & Stamos, I. (2012). How do large-scale infrastructure projects contribute to environmental improvement. The case of Thessaloniki’s outer ring road. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 13(1), 219-226.
Preston, J. (2001). Integrating transport with socio-economic activity–a research agenda for the new millennium. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(1), 13-24. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00039-9.
Schlager, K. J. (1965). A land use plan design model. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(2), 103-111. doi:10.1080/01944366508978151.
Stamos, I., Kitis, G., Basbas, S., & Tzevelekis, I. (2012). Evaluation of a High Occupancy Vehicle Lane in Central Business District Thessaloniki. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 1088-1096. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1085.
Stamos, I., Kitis, G., Basbas, S. (2013). The implementation of a contra flow bus lane in the city of Thessaloniki: energy and environmental impacts. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22(7b), 2191-2196.
Van Wee, B. (2002). Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(4), 259-271. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00041-8.
Webster, F. & Paulley, N. (1990). An international study on land‐use and transport interaction, Transport Review,10(4), 287-308. doi: 10.1080/01441649008716763.
Wilson, A. G. (1998). Land-use/transport interaction models: Past and future. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,32(1) 3-26. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20053753.
Wegener, M. (2004). Overview of land-use transport models. In D. A. Hensher & K. Button (Eds.), Transport Geography and Spatial Systems. Handbook 5 of the Handbook in Transport (pp. 127-146). Kidlington, UK: Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN-13: 978-008044108.
Copyright (c) 2015 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)