MSW: From pollution/degradation source to resource
Municipal Solid Waste is one of the biggest challenges that cities are facing: MSW is considered of the main sources of energy consumption, urban degradation and pollution. This paper defines the major negative effects of MSW on cities and proposes new solutions to guide waste policies. Most contemporary waste management efforts are focused at regional government level and based on high tech waste disposal by methods such as landfill and incineration. However, these methods are becoming increasingly expensive, energy inefficient and pollutant: waste disposal is not sustainable and will have negative implications for future generations. In this paper are proposed all the principle solutions that could be undertaken. New policy instruments are presented updating and adapting policies and encouraging innovation for less wasteful systems. Waste management plans are fundamental to increase the ability of urban areas to effectively adapt to waste challenges. These plans have to give an outline of waste streams and treatment options and provide a scenario for the following years that significantly reduce landfills and incinerators in favor of prevention, reuse and recycling. The key aim of an urban waste management plan is to set out the work towards a zero waste economy as part of the transition to a sustainable economy. Other questions remain still opened: How to change people’s behavior? What is the role of environmental education and risk perception? It is sure that the involvement of the various stakeholders and the wider public in the planning process should aim at ensuring acceptance of the waste policy.
AA.VV. (2009). Ambiente, inquinamento, responsabilità, Enciclopedia degli Enti locali, Giuffrè Editore, Milano.
AA.VV. (2013). Food Waste As A Global I From the perspective perspective of municipal municipal ISWA – the International Solid Waste Association, Wien, Austria.
Ahmed A., Quader M.A (2011). Environmental Aspects of Solid Waste Management: A Case Study of Narayanganj City. Vol. 5 No. 1, ISSN: 1839-7239, ASA University Review.
Allesch A., Brunner P.H.(2014). Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review, DOI: 10.1177/0734242X14535653, Sage Journal.
Barr S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour, Royal Geographical Society ISSN 0004-0894 Volume 35, Issue 3, pages 227–240, Area.
Bernardini Mosconi P., Gagliardi R.P.,(2003), Capire dove si vive per capire il mondo. Il modello territoriale per l'educazione ambientale, Armando Editore, Roma.
Choate A., Pederson L., Scharfenberg J. (2005), Waste management and energy savings: benefits by the numbers,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
Connett P. (2013). The Zero Waste Solution: Untrashing the Planet One Community at a Time, ISBN 9781603584890, Chelsea Green Publishing.
Daw J. , Hallett K. (2012). Energy Efficiency Strategies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities. NREL/TP-7A30-53341 National Renewable Energy, Colorado, USA.
DICCA- University of Genoa (2011). Analisi comprendente quattro buone prassi di sviluppo sostenibile identificate a livello di programma - Active Project- Action Vert.
DICCA- University of Genoa (2013). Proposition des lignes guides pour la prédisposition d’ un plan de gestion des déchets au niveau urbain dans la zone euro-méditerranéenne. Med-3r Project - Plateforme Stratégique euro-méditerranéenne pour une gestion adaptée des déchets.
EPA (2010), Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Natural Sources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
EPA (2014), Landfill Gas Energy Basics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
EPA (2015), Social cost of carbon, EPA FACT SHEET, Washington DC.
European Commission Directorate-General Environment (2012). Preparing a Waste Management Plan. A methodological guidance note, Brussels, Belgium.
Fontes B. (2008), Study on risk perception, American Biological Safety Association (ABSA).
Halkos G. E., Tzeremes N. G. (2013).National culture and eco-efficiency: an application of conditional partial nonparametric frontiers, Vol. 15, Issue 4, DOI 10.1007/s10018-013-0066-6, pp 423-441,Japan: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
Hogg D.A (2006). Changing Climate for Energy from Waste? United Kingdom: Eunomia Research & Consulting.
Hoornweg D., Bhada-Tata P., (2012), What a waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management, n°15 Urban Development & Local Government Unit World Bank, Washington.
IEFE – Bocconi (2010). Progetto: Analisi comparativa di percorsi per il recupero di materia e di energia da rifiuti, PRIN, Unità Operative: Dip. Energia e DIIAR - Politecnico di Milano, DIEM – Università di Bologna, DICA – Università di Trento, IEFE – Università Bocconi.
ISWA (2013), International Solid Waste Association ISWA REPORT, Vienna.
Luhman N. (1996). Sociologia del rischio, Bruno Mondatori, Milano.
Manuale di Epitteto (2006), Introduzione e commento di Pierre Hadot, Piccola biblioteca Einaudi, Roma.
Miranda D. A., de Carvalho-Souza G. F., Are we eating plastic-ingesting fish?, Elsevier Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 105, Issue 1, 15 April 2016, Page 438.
Moen B.E., Sjöberg L., Rundmo T. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research, ISBN 82-7892-024-9, Editor: Torbjørn Rundmo, Trondheim, Norway.
Morris J. (1996), Recycling versus incineration: an energy conservation analysis, Journal of Hadardaus materials 47 (1196) 277-293 Elsevier.
Pirlone F. (2015). I rifiuti e i piani di gestione urbana all’interno della governance, ISBN 978-88-917-1498-5, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Pyper J. (2011). Does Burning Garbage to Produce Electricity Make Sense? LLC. 202-628-6500, USA: Environment & Energy Publishing.
Starr C., Whipple C. (1980). Risk of Risk Decision. 208: 1114-1119, USA: Science
Wilson D.C., Velis C. (2014). Cities and waste: Current and emerging issues, Waste Management & Research, Vol. 32(9) 797–799, UK: SAGE Journals.
Wilson DC, Rodic L, Scheinberg A, Velis CA & Alabaster G (2012). Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Management & Research, 30(3) 237–254, UK: SAGE Journals.
Copyright (c) 2016 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)