Sustainable Urban Mobility: Current Strategies and New Challenges for European Cities

  • Adriana Galderisi Dipartimento di Pianificazione e Scienza del Territorio

Abstract

In the decade 2001 – 2010 the European Union has undertaken taken numerous initiatives to guide the European cities toward sustainable mobility.

The common purpose of the several initiatives implemented by the EU consisted in increasing, mainly in urban areas, mobility – unavoidable requirement for a competitive development of cities and for assuring better opportunities of access to urban services – and a contemporaneous drastic reduction of the heavy environmental costs that still now are associated with urban mobility.

Strategies, initiatives and researches at European level have been addressed, during the decade 2001-2010, to promote a substantial limitation of current car-based mobility inside urban areas and to improve different forms of sustainable mobility.

In detail, strategies and acitons have been mainly targeted to:

- encourage innovations in the ways and means of urban transport;

- assure an intermodal balance inside urban areas, improving public transport, above all rail transport, and pedestrian and bicycle travels;

- overcome the segmentation that has long characterized transport planning, outlining governance processes based on the integration between policies and tools for city, transport and environment planning (Galderisi, 2007).

Starting from 2007, the European Union has further and significantly increased its engagement in reducing the environmental cost of urban mobility.

From the Green Paper on Urban Transport to the Covenant of Mayors aimed to actively involve the European cities in the path towards energy and environmental sustainability and, still, to the recent Transport White Paper 2011, several initiatives have been implemented by the European Union in order to effectively achieve the goals outlined in the  White Paper 2001 and to define the future targets.

Moreover, the new environmental challenges that the cities, not only the European ones, have to face in the future, from the climate changes to the growing costs and progressive oil reduction (a long-term although not negligible perspective), have helped to strengthen the centrality of urban mobility in scientific field.

Besides, new research perspectives that frame the above-said topic of urban mobility into the wider theoretical framework of  the  “resilient” city are increasingly taking shape.

Therefore, starting from a brief survey of the recent initiatives put forward by the European Union for  sustainable urban mobility, this contribution focuses on the remarkable role that the concept of resilience plays in the present review of urban mobility policies and, mainly, in providing a decisive push towards an effective integration between governance of urban transformation and governance of mobility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adriana Galderisi, Dipartimento di Pianificazione e Scienza del Territorio

Adriana Galderisi, researcher at the “Dipartimento di Pianificazione e Scienza del Territorio” of the University of Naples Federico II, Professor of Town Planning at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Naples Federico II; Ph.D. in Urban and Regional Planning.

Research activities are addressed to the requalification of urban environment, focusing  on the relationships between urban mobility and urban quality and on the vulnerability of urban systems to natural and na-tech events.

References

Alberti, M., Marzluff, J.M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C. e Zumbrunnen, C. (2003), “Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems”, BioScience, 53: 1169-1179.

AA.VV. (2007) “Urban Resilience. Research Prospectus. A Resilience Alliance Initiative for Transitioning Urban Systems towards Sustainable Futures”, http://www.resalliance.org/ files/1172764197_urbanresilienceresearchprospectusv7feb07.pdf

Bosher, L., ed., (2008), Hazards and the Built Environment: Attaining built-in resilience, Taylor & Francis.

Breheny, M.J., ed., (1992), Sustainable Development and Urban Form, London, Pion Limited (European Research in Regional Science, No.2).

Christoplos, I. (2006), “The elusive ‘window of opportunity’ for risk reduction in post-disaster recovery”, http://www.proventionconsortium.org/themes/default/pdfs/Forum06/ Forum06_Session3_Recovery.pdf

Dosch, F. Porsche, L. (2011), Rebuild the City! Towards Resource-efficient Urban Structures through the Use of Energy Concepts, Adaptation to Climate Change, and Land Use Management, in Muller, B., ed., German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010.

Foster, A. K. (2010), Regional Resilience. How Do We Know It When We See It?, http://www.gwu.edu/~gwipp/Foster%20—20Regional%20Resilience%20May %202010.pdf

Galderisi, A. (2007), “Città, mobilità e ambiente nelle strategie e nei progetti di ricerca dell’Unione Europea”, in TeMA, Trimestrale del Laboratorio Territorio Mobilità e Ambiente, anno 0 - No 0 - pagg. 23-32, http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/20/20.

Galderisi, A. (2009), “Scelte di mobilità, diffusione insediativa e costi ambientali”, in TeMA, Trimestrale del Laboratorio Territorio Mobilità e Ambiente, Vol 2 - No 4 - pagg. 21-30, http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/101/103.

Galderisi, A. e Ceudech, A. (2010), “La logistica nei processi di trasformazione dell’area orientale di Napoli”, in TeMA, Trimestrale del Laboratorio Territorio Mobilità e Ambiente, Vol 3 - No 2, pagg. 73-84, http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/169/171.

Holling, C.S., (1973), Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4:1-23.

Holling, C.S. (1996) Engineering resilience versus Ecological resilience, in P. Schulze, ed., “Engineering with ecological constrains”. National Academy, Washington, D.C., USA.

Holling, C. S. (2001), “Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Social and Ecological Systems,” Ecosystems 4 (August), 390-405.

Muller, B., (2011) “Urban and Regional Resilience - A new catchword or a consistent concept for research and practice”, in Muller, B., ed., German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010.

Newman, P., Beatley, T., and Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change. Washington: Island Press.

Karlenzig, W. (2010) The Death of Sprawl. Designing Urban Resilience for the Twenty-First-Century Resource and Climate Crises, Post Carbon Institute, http://www.postcarbon.org/report/109840-cities-the-death-of-sprawl.

Rees, W. (2010), Thinking “Resilience”, Post Carbon Institute, http://www.postcarbon.org/report/284699-foundation-concepts-thinking-resilience.

Published
2011-07-28
How to Cite
Galderisi, A. (2011). Sustainable Urban Mobility: Current Strategies and New Challenges for European Cities. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/443
Section
Contributions