Planning Assignments of the Italian Metropolitan Cities. Early Trends
AbstractThe last stage of the process of establishment of the Italian Metropolitan Cities, which took place in 2014, follows of a few decades the start of this institutional reform. In 1990, in fact, the Act 142 (Local Autonomies Reform) had planned metropolitan areas as the administrative organization more suitable to provide these territories of structures for the management and the strategic development alike the best international models. The paper proposes to analyse the first activities taken by the Italian Metropolitan Cities in the sector of territorial government, three years after the enactment in 2014 of Act nr. 56. Focal point of the analysis is the jurisdiction in the formation of two plans (the Strategic Plan and the Metropolitan Territorial Plan) and the following relationships among them, in the logical assumption that between them a necessary and strict consistency there should be. In the first part, the paper analyses some factors characterizing the metropolitan areas and the functions that the law assigns to the new institution in the territorial government sector. The second part outlines the updated situation with regard to the formation of the sectoral tools (Strategic Plan, Territorial Plan and homogeneous zones). The third part analyses the progresses in three Metropolitan Cities taken as sample (Milan, Genoa and Bologna) and, in general, to those of Southern Italy. In the last part, the paper exposes some considerations regarding the issues raised in the article, particularly about the innovativeness of the tools and the timeline for the implementation of the act.
Barbieri, C.A. (2015). Dall’istituzione all’azione della Città metropolitana di Torino: il ruolo di una nuova pianificazione. Il Piemonte delle Autonomie. II(2), 8-14.
BBSR (2011). Metropolitan Areas in Europe. BBSR-Online-Publikation, Nr. 01/2011. Bonn: Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development.
Conticelli, E., Proli, S., Tondelli, S. & Vecchietti, S. (2016), Città Metropolitana di Bologna, Urbanistica Informazioni. 267-268, 41-45.
De Luca, G. (2016). The paradigmatic case of the Metropolitan city of Florence. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 223, 108-112.
Gastaldi, F. & Zarino, S. (2015). La Città metropolitana: compiti e ruoli nella pianificazione del territorio. EyesReg. 5(1), 11-13. http://www.eyesreg.it/.
Hamilton, D.K., Miller, D.Y. & Paytas, J. (2004). Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governance of metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Review. 40(2), 147-182.
ISPRA (2016). Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. Edizione 2016. Rapporto 248/2016. Roma: ISPRA.
Kübler, D. & Heinelt, H. (2002). An analytical framework for democratic metropolitan governance. 30th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshop. Turin, March 2002.
Mazzeo, G. (2009), Dall’area metropolitana allo sprawl urbano: la disarticolazione del territorio. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. 2(4). 7-20. doi: 10.6092/1970-9870/100.
Mazzeo, G. (2015a). Specificità della Città Metropolitana di Napoli. Pianificare con l’emergenza. EyesReg. 5(3), 92-95. http://www.eyesreg.it/.
Mazzeo, G. (2015b). Il Piano Territoriale Generale della Città Metropolitana. In F.D. Moccia, A. Sgobbo (cur.), Bilancio e rinnovo della legge urbanistica regionale. Dopo 10 anni di L.R. 16/2004. Urbanistica Informazioni. 259-260, 48-51.
Mazzeo, G. (2016). La città leggera - Smart City e urbanistica attuativa. FedOA Press (Federico II Open Access University Press), Napoli. doi: 10.6093/978-88-6887-008-9.
Nobili, P. (2016), Città Metropolitana di Milano. Urbanistica Informazioni. 267-268, 34-37.
Papa, R., Gargiulo, C., Franco, S. & Russo. L. (2014). Urban smartness Vs urban competitiveness: a comparison of Italian cities rankings. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. Input 2014. 771-782. doi.10.6092/1970-9870/2555.
Pasetti, A. (2016), Città Metropolitana di Genova. Urbanistica Informazioni. 267-268, 37-40.
Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy. 13(6). 343-373.
Sassen, S. (2001), The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Salet, W., Thomley, A. & Kreukels, A. (2003). Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning. Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions. London: Spon Press.
Sbetti, F. (2016). Indirizzi per la pianificazione territoriale delle Città Metropolitane, Urbanistica Informazioni. 267-268, 28-29.
Spadaro, A. (2015), Le Città metropolitane, tra utopia e realtà, Federalismi.it. 14/01/2015. http://federalismi.it/.
UN (2015). World Population Prospects. The 2014 Revision. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division.
Copyright (c) 2017 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)