Monitoring User-Based Accessibility Assessment in Urban Environments and in Public Buildings
The research features analysis of user-experience-based accessibility assessment and progress monitoring of buildings and public spaces; this analysis is used as a tool for facilitating the development of humane, socially sustainable and an inclusive urban environment. A group of users representing people with different kinds of disabilities, the elderly and families with children was created to assess the quality of access to various buildings with different functions and locations across Vilnius and in Singapore. A school, two hospitals, a rehab centre and two offices were selected for access monitoring in Vilnius City, while a hotel, a café and two metro stations with public squares were chosen for access assessment in Singapore. As the same method was principally applied to assess accessibility of selected buildings in Vilnius City in 2000 and 2017 and in Singapore in 2012, the article draws a comparative analysis of access levels in these two cities located in different global regions. The results show a definite improvement of access quality over time and also identify the critical aspects in this process. The segment of plot planning represents the lowest quality of access for all assessed building types as compared to the building segment and the external–internal element segments. The paper also draws conclusions that access improvement is a continuous process of implementing advanced urban policy instruments, and city planners can contribute to it by constantly analysing and presenting to public the monitoring data about the progress in access improvement. Comparing the assessment results between Vilnius City and Singapore – cities that are located in different global regions and in different socio-economic environments – provides a practical tool for benchmarking and setting the priorities for this process.
Accessibility Code. (2007). Code on accessibility in the built environment 2007. Singapore Building and Construction Authority BCA. Available at https://www.bca.gov.sg/BarrierFree/others/AccessibilityCode2007.pdf. Accessed on August 16, 2017.
Accessibility Code. (2013). Code on accessibility in the built environment 2013. Singapore Building and Construction Authority BCA. Available at https://www.bca.gov.sg/BarrierFree/others/ACCESSIBILITY_CODE_2013.pdf. Accessed on August 16, 2017.
Ahlberg, M., Turja, L., & Robinson, J. (2003). Educational research and development to promote sustainable development in the City of Helsinki: Helping the Accessible Helsinki Programme 2001–2011 to achieve its goals. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 2(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2003.003321
Americans with Disabilities Act. Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). (1994). Washington, DC: US Government Board for Internal Affairs.
Bhakta, A., & Pickerill, J. (2016). Making space for disability in eco-homes and eco-communities. Geographical Journal, 182, 406–417.
Blecic, I., Canu, D., Cecchini, A., Congiu, T., & Fancello, G. (2017). Walkability and street intersections in rural-urban fringes: A decision aiding evaluation procedure. Sustainability, 9(6), 19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060883
Bromley, R. D. F., Matthews, D. L., & Thomas, C. J. (2007). City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities, 24(3), 229–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.009
Calder, A. M., & Mulligan, H. F. (2014). Measurement properties of instruments that assess inclusive access to fitness and recreational sports centers: A systematic review. Disability and Health Journal, 7, 26–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.06.003
Casas, I. (2007). Social exclusion and the disabled: An accessibility approach. Professional Geographer, 59, 463–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00635.x
Gabel, S., & Peters, S. (2004). Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability and Society, 19(6), 585–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000252515
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 9781597265737
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. (2010). US Department of Justice. Available at www.ada.gov. p. 170.
Johansson, M., Rosen, M., & Kueller, R. (2011). Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath. Lighting Research Technology, 43, 31–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153510370757
Kamarudin, H., Hashim, A. E., Mahmood, M., Ariff, N. R. M., & Ismail, W. Z. W. (2012). The implementation of the Malaysian Standard Code of Practice on access for disabled persons by local authority. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 442–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.048
Meşhur, H. F. A. (2016). Evaluation of urban spaces from the perspective of universal design principles. The case of Konya/Turkey. TeMA: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 9(2), 191–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/3786
Mulligan, H. F., & Fletcher, H. (2006). The principles of inclusive design. England, UK: The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment CABE.
Rosemary D. F. B., Matthews, D. L., & Thomas, C. J. (2007). City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities, 24(3), 229–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.009
Shakespeare, T. W. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London, UK: Routledge.
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.
Statybos Techninis Reglamentas STR 2.03.01:2001. (2010). Statiniai ir teritorijos. Reikalavimai žmonių su negalia reikmėms [Buildings and territories. Requirements for people with disabilities]. Vilnius: LR Aplinkos Ministerija.
Statybos Techninių Reikalavimų Reglamentas STR 2.03.01:2001. (2001). Statiniai ir teritorijos. Reikalavimai žmonių su negalia reikmėms [Buildings and territories. Requirements for people with disabilities]. Vilnius: LR Aplinkos Ministerija.
Stauskis, G. (2017). The Methodology for Evaluating Accessibility as a Tool for Increasing Social Responsiveness of Urban Landscapes in Singapore. Acta Sci. Pol. Formatio Circumiectus, 16(2), 199–216.
Stockholm – A City for Everyone. (2011). Participation programme for people with disabilities 2011–2016. Sweden: Stockholms Stad.
Sun, G., Zacharias, J., Ma, B., & Oreskovic, N. M. (2016). How do metro stations integrate with walking environments? Results from walking access within three types of built environment in Beijing. Cities, 56, 91–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.001
Universal Design Guide. (2007). Singapore Building and Construction Authority. Available at https://www.bca.gov.sg/BarrierFree/others/ud_guide_2007.pdf. Accessed on August 16, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2018 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)