Virucity. Rethinking the urban system
The paper focuses attention on three fundamental points. The first one concerns an analysis of the urban condition perceived and detected directly by the observation of the city suddenly deprived of the fruition component and characterized by the functional reset of urban activities with the exception of health functions. The second element is attributable to a systemic interpretation of the phenomenon through the analysis of the effects on urban subsystems produced by the pandemic, recalling the holistic approach to the study of urban phenomena. The third element concerns the envisaging of possible post-virus urban scenarios for which a significant bifurcation is foreseen: on the one hand, if the virus produced a rethinking of life models and the need for new ways of acting and interacting in the city we could imagine an urban future characterized by a general rebalancing of anthropic contexts; on the other hand, if the desire to return to entropic and energy-consuming models will prevail, we will continue to witness the slow degradation of human and natural habitats that will lead to the “right” extinction of human beings. These alternatives underlie a series of dilemmas that the paper emphasizes as structuring elements of possible future urban scenarios, highlighting the fundamental role of urban scientists and planners.
Borgo, S. (2019). An ontological view of components and interactions in behaviorally adaptive systems. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, pp. 1-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JID190013
Esopi, G. (2018). Urban commons: social resilience experiences to increase the quality of urban system. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11(2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5532
Forester, J. (1998). Pianificazione e Potere, pratiche e teorie interattive del progetto urbano. Bari: Dedalo.
Friedman, J. (1998). “The right to the city” In R. Morse & J. Hardoy (eds.), Rethinking The Latin America City Baltimora: John Hopkins University Press.
Giordano, P. (2020). Nel contagio. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
Heidegger, M. (1976). Saggi e discorsi. Milano: Mursia.
Lefebvre, H. (2009). Il diritto alla città. Verona: Ombre Corte.
Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, Vol. 19, 2, pp. 79-88.
Lindblom, C. (1990). Inquiry and Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Marx, K. (1993) [1857-1858]. Grundrisse [Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Okonomie]. New York: Penguin.
Rovelli, C. (2020). La storia ci racconta di epidemie che credevamo fossero altro da noi e per sempre. Ma siamo stati colpiti e ci salveremo se condivideremo la conoscenza. Corriere della Sera, May 31.
Weber, M. (1986) . The City. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
Lynch, K. (1997). Il tempo dello spazio. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
Lèvy, H-B. (2020). Il virus e l’altro pianeta. La Repubblica, May 9.
Copyright (c) 2020 TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)